Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932775AbZINSSv (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:18:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932765AbZINSSp (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:18:45 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56980 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932755AbZINSSl (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:18:41 -0400 Subject: Re: Warning from ring buffer code (Was: Re: linux-next: tip tree build warning) From: Steven Rostedt To: Christopher Li Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput , Ingo Molnar , Stephen Rothwell , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, Josh Triplett , Frederic Weisbecker In-Reply-To: <70318cbf0909141009v46581785m4c70edf31fcb79fa@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090804161640.70817ee6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1249403089.4634.139.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090912165300.9d257283.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090912073906.GA3972@elte.hu> <1252753957.12217.10.camel@ht.satnam> <1252941416.2964.143.camel@localhost.localdomain> <70318cbf0909141009v46581785m4c70edf31fcb79fa@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Red Hat Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:17:18 -0400 Message-Id: <1252952238.2964.154.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1406 Lines: 44 On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 10:09 -0700, Christopher Li wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > static void func(int size_me) { > > char array[size_me]; > > > > memcpy(array, "hello", size); > > }; > > > > and sparse failed on it as well. Note, you need to have something call > > func, or sparse will ignore it. > > Gcc allows variable size. Sparse expects the size of an array is constant. > For the kernel using variable array size is consider bad. Because the kernel > has very limited stack size. (8K if I remember correctly). Using dynamic array > is very easy to overflow the stack without realizing it. > > It deserves a warning. I agree the warning message can use a better description > though. Good point! I've added Frederic to the Cc list, since he wrote the code. Frederic, how big can one of those events get. The ring buffer (and TRACE_EVENT) allow up to almost a page size, which is very hefty for the stack. This code needs to either be rewritten or we need to set a limit to the size of a profile entry. We could add: if (__entry_size > 256) return; Thoughts? -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/