Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 05:33:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 05:33:38 -0500 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237]:50416 "EHLO passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 05:33:30 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: David Woodhouse X-Accept-Language: en_GB In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Jeff Garzik , Anders Gustafsson , arjanv@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mochel@osdl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] devexit fixes in i82092.c Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 10:32:48 +0000 Message-ID: <31288.1016274768@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org torvalds@transmeta.com said: > Ideally we should, yes. Although if we really turn off power, it > doesn't much matter. But we might just be rebooting, not turning off power. And in that case we may want to ensure devices are returned to a sane state. Like ensuring that the CPU startup vector is pointing at a flash chip which is in _read_ mode, not returning status words. Yes, it happens. I was pondering a reboot notifier but didn't like that much so was ignoring the problem for now. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/