Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757474AbZINWfT (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:35:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757460AbZINWfR (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:35:17 -0400 Received: from fifo99.com ([67.223.236.141]:52402 "EHLO fifo99.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757458AbZINWfR (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:35:17 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/72] Blackfin updates for 2.6.32 From: Daniel Walker To: Mike Frysinger Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org In-Reply-To: <8bd0f97a0909141517i3535bb84j4cbac0cd986d4914@mail.gmail.com> References: <1252958896-25150-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <1252961412.11643.215.camel@desktop> <8bd0f97a0909141357y60d7807bm99146d757e6f61da@mail.gmail.com> <1252962263.11643.232.camel@desktop> <8bd0f97a0909141407i26b39f9bq133a62be381601b5@mail.gmail.com> <1252963292.11643.259.camel@desktop> <8bd0f97a0909141517i3535bb84j4cbac0cd986d4914@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:36:07 -0700 Message-Id: <1252967767.11643.286.camel@desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1380 Lines: 34 On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 18:17 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > this code i had rewritten and as fallout, the style changed. looks > fine to me, and no, this particular checpatch "error" is not always > worthwhile (like in this case). Have you read Documentation/CodingStyle ? Can you better explain why your don't want to follow that document ? Most people accept that to be the style of code in Linux, and that is what checkpatch checks for.. We also have this quote from Documentation/SubmittingPatches "4) Style check your changes. Check your patch for basic style violations, details of which can be found in Documentation/CodingStyle. Failure to do so simply wastes the reviewers time and will get your patch rejected, probably without even being read. At a minimum you should check your patches with the patch style checker prior to submission (scripts/checkpatch.pl). You should be able to justify all violations that remain in your patch." If you ultimately don't correct these changes, I'd ask that in the future you submit pull requests for the blackfin architecture instead of sending individual patches .. Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/