Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757480AbZINWyn (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:54:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757468AbZINWyn (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:54:43 -0400 Received: from fifo99.com ([67.223.236.141]:37402 "EHLO fifo99.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757467AbZINWym (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:54:42 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch 3/6] add pmem driver From: Daniel Walker To: Brian Swetland Cc: Pavel Machek , Greg KH , arve@android.com, kernel list , Iliyan Malchev , Petri Gynther In-Reply-To: References: <20090914215855.GC11667@elf.ucw.cz> <1252965980.11643.261.camel@desktop> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:55:32 -0700 Message-Id: <1252968932.11643.299.camel@desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2043 Lines: 44 On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 15:19 -0700, Brian Swetland wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Daniel Walker wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 23:58 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > >> > >> This adds android pmem driver, one of dependencies of camera driver. > > > > I wouldn't even both with this one .. There's no way it could ever go > > into mainline .. According to the android developers the camera , and > > the frame buffer driver should work without it anyway.. > > The latest camera driver should work without pmem (or be fixable to do > so -- I forget if that's done yet). > > The framebuffer itself does not need pmem, but pmem is used heavily by > the android userspace on dream/magic for hardware compositable > surfaces (since the 2d compositor requires physically contiguous > memory). > > Is there a general linux kernel solution for managing large (1-8MB+) > chunks of physically contiguous memory that needs to be shared between > kernel and userspace for media operations? This is a very common > problem with these SoCs -- the a/v subsystem and/or GPU don't have > scatter/gather or MMU support and as a result we need to carve out > memory for their use and provide some way for userspace to manipulate > it. After out last conversation I found the the system calls splice/vm-splice .. I don't know a great deal about those system call, but from what I read that sounded like it would be the appropriate way to transfer memory between two kernel drivers (i.e. camera to framebuffer) .. As for sharing it with userspace, I haven't really researched that enough to give a good answer. I would think you could build something into the camera driver that would expose the memory to userspace temporarily then the camera could reclaim the memory later. Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/