Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 11:03:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 11:03:24 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:21258 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 11:03:08 -0500 To: John Levon Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Nice values for kernel modules In-Reply-To: <16358.1016282075@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <20020316154848.GA82190@compsoc.man.ac.uk.suse.lists.linux.kernel> From: Andi Kleen Date: 16 Mar 2002 17:03:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: John Levon's message of "16 Mar 2002 16:53:27 +0100" Message-ID: Lines: 17 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.6 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org John Levon writes: > On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 11:34:35PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote: > > > I can see no good reason why the syscall table has been exported. > > please don't change this. Just because it breaks on architectures X > and Y doesn't mean it's useless. > > System call snooping is an ugly thing but being able to do it without > patching the kernel is incredibly useful. We're not unaware that > it is arch-specific. I can just second that. It would make it impossible to fix pice for 2.5 for example. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/