Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 12:53:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 12:53:33 -0500 Received: from pcls3.std.com ([199.172.62.105]:61874 "EHLO TheWorld.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 12:53:30 -0500 Message-ID: <3C938693.6D29979C@world.std.com> Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 12:53:23 -0500 From: Gordon J Lee X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.18-m1 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: IBM x360 2.2.x boot failure, 2.4.9 works fine In-Reply-To: <3C927F3E.7C7FB075@world.std.com> <20020315234333.GH5563@kroah.com> <3C92B1EA.F40BDBD5@world.std.com> <20020316055542.GA8125@kroah.com> <3C938093.D1640CB6@world.std.com> <20020316173434.GB10003@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > 2.4.18 shows two processors > > 2.4.19-pre3 shows two processors > > 2.4.19-pre3-ac1 shows four processors > > Great, thanks for testing. I'd recommend using this hardware :) >From your earlier post, I presume that the bug here was simply a presentation layer bug in /proc/cpuinfo, and that kernel versions previous to 2.4.19-pre3-ac1 can actually use all of the logical processors. Is this correct ? If so, at which 2.4.x kernel did support for hyperthreading show up? - GL - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/