Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 15:50:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 15:50:41 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:55818 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 15:50:24 -0500 Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 21:50:23 +0100 From: Dave Jones To: Alan Cox Cc: S W , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.19-pre2 Cyrix III SEGFAULT (Cyrix II redux?) Message-ID: <20020316215023.D15296@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Alan Cox , S W , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020316204228.B15296@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 09:01:06PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > > But I recalled Linux 2.2 having a bug fix for broken > > > L2 cache in Cyrix II. > > The cache itself isn't broken. Reporting of the size of it is. > He's talking about a different bug. Some early 6x86 processors had weird > problems with cache behaviour that would sometimes break stuff. Ah, my bad. So much errata, so little memory.. -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/