Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:41:16 +0200
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       akpm@linux-foundation.org, cl@linux-foundation.org,
       heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, mingo@elte.hu, sachinp@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] SLQB: Mark the allocator as broken PowerPC and S390
Message-ID: <20090917114116.GL18404@wotan.suse.de>
References: <1253083059.5478.1.camel@penberg-laptop> <20090917100841.GF13002@csn.ul.ie> <1253183365.4975.20.camel@penberg-laptop> <20090917105707.GA7205@csn.ul.ie> <1253186019.4975.32.camel@penberg-laptop> <20090917111828.GB7205@csn.ul.ie>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090917111828.GB7205@csn.ul.ie>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1061
Lines: 26

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:18:28PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 02:13:39PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 11:08 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > > > The danger is if SLQB is being silently disabled, it'll never be noticed
> > > > > or debugged :/
> > > > 
> > > > Maybe, but that's not an excuse to push something that's known to break. 
> > 
> > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 11:57 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > Wow, this is from back in May! Lame.
> > 
> > Heh, my (lame) excuse is lack of relevant hardware.... ;-)
> > 
> 
> I'm not blaming you. It's just ... unfortunate :/

Ahh... it's pretty lame of me. Sachin has been a willing tester :(
I have spent quite a few hours looking at it but I never found
many good leads. Much appreciated if you can make more progress on
it.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/