Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758122AbZIQR30 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:29:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757684AbZIQR3W (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:29:22 -0400 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:47312 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757313AbZIQR3U (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:29:20 -0400 To: Greg KH Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kay Sievers References: <20090917125759.GA4045@kroah.com> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:29:18 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20090917125759.GA4045@kroah.com> (Greg KH's message of "Thu\, 17 Sep 2009 05\:57\:59 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-XM-SPF: eid=;;;mid=;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=76.21.114.89;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 76.21.114.89 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa03 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Greg KH X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Report: * -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG * -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa03 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 XM_SPF_Neutral SPF-Neutral * 0.4 UNTRUSTED_Relay Comes from a non-trusted relay Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove broken by design and by implementation devtmpfs maintenance disaster X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:26:12 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1595 Lines: 39 Greg KH writes: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 01:23:39AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> devtmpfs has numerous problems. The once I see from a quick review. > > > > I'm confused, why did you not at least cc: Kay and I on this message, if > I was a paranoid person, I would think that you were somehow trying to > skirt around us for some unknown reason :( You just aren't relevant to this discussion except where you repeatedly demonstrate you aren't willing to listen to anyone who hasn't drunk the devtmpfs coolaid. If you were interested in honest review and feedback you would have copied me from the second review onward. You didn't do that. Why should I extend you the courtesy. This isn't your decision to make. > I think Kay has raised the proper points already. Kay blithely replied to my points but he wasn't paying attention, and certainly did not look at how what I have said applies to the code. Greg this code does not live up to the standards you have repeatedly asserted are required for accepting core kernel code. Neither you nor Kay show any interest in fixing even the most trivial of bugs. Must less discuss alternate solutions to the problem. My recommendation stands as you are unwilling to fix bugs and listen to other peoples opinion merging the code at this time is a bad idea. Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/