Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751981AbZIRGHJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:07:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751346AbZIRGHH (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:07:07 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:46998 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750997AbZIRGHG (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:07:06 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:54:23 -0700 From: Greg KH To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kay Sievers Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove broken by design and by implementation devtmpfs maintenance disaster Message-ID: <20090918055423.GA7104@kroah.com> References: <20090917125759.GA4045@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2448 Lines: 58 On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:29:18AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Greg KH writes: > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 01:23:39AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > >> > >> devtmpfs has numerous problems. The once I see from a quick review. > > > > > > > > I'm confused, why did you not at least cc: Kay and I on this message, if > > I was a paranoid person, I would think that you were somehow trying to > > skirt around us for some unknown reason :( > > You just aren't relevant to this discussion except where you > repeatedly demonstrate you aren't willing to listen to anyone who > hasn't drunk the devtmpfs coolaid. Oh, we have official team drinks now? Great, sign me up, can I pick a t-shirt logo as well? :) > If you were interested in honest review and feedback you would have > copied me from the second review onward. You didn't do that. Why > should I extend you the courtesy. This isn't your decision to make. I'm sorry I forgot to copy you, and the other people that provided feedback on the original few versions, that's my fault. I kind of assumed that people found the first version on their own, the updates would be in the same place as well. I had not kept track of the reviewers and commentors properly. My fault, and I'm sorry. But for you to think I was purposefully slighting you, or anyone else, and that slight would justify completly ignoring the original authors and submittors of the code, seems, well, a big streach. > Greg this code does not live up to the standards you have repeatedly > asserted are required for accepting core kernel code. Neither you > nor Kay show any interest in fixing even the most trivial of bugs. > Must less discuss alternate solutions to the problem. I'm really sorry, but I know of no existing bugs in this code. Seriously, I thought we addressed everything that was pointed out. A large number of people have tested this in quite different environments, and we got sign-off-bys by all of the boot logic infrastructure maintainers from the major distros, as proof of that testing. I don't know of any standards that we are not following here, what specifically are you referring to? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/