Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 17 Mar 2002 05:50:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 17 Mar 2002 05:49:58 -0500 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237]:21750 "EHLO passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 17 Mar 2002 05:49:45 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: David Woodhouse X-Accept-Language: en_GB In-Reply-To: <3C938027.4040805@mandrakesoft.com> In-Reply-To: <3C938027.4040805@mandrakesoft.com> <200203161608.g2GG8WC05423@localhost.localdomain> <3C9372BE.4000808@mandrakesoft.com> <20020316083059.A10086@work.bitmover.com> <3C9375B7.3070808@mandrakesoft.com> <20020316085213.B10086@work.bitmover.com> <3C937B82.60500@mandrakesoft.com> <20020316091452.E10086@work.bitmover.com> To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Larry McVoy , James Bottomley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Problems using new Linux-2.4 bitkeeper repository. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 10:49:34 +0000 Message-ID: <30393.1016362174@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com said: > The system currently punishes Joe in Alaska and Mikhail in Russia if > they independently apply the same GNU patch, and then later on wind > up attempting to converge trees. I tried to work round this by applying some patches which I require but which Linus hasn't yet taken _only_ in my working tree, not actually committing them. But then BK wouldn't even let me pull from Linus' tree any more, because I had locked and modified files. That also seems to be a fundamental flaw. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/