Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 17 Mar 2002 08:05:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 17 Mar 2002 08:05:43 -0500 Received: from smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.137]:14855 "EHLO smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 17 Mar 2002 08:05:32 -0500 Message-ID: <3C94948E.777B5BAF@linux-m68k.org> Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 14:05:18 +0100 From: Roman Zippel X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel , kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: alternative linux configurator prototype v0.2 In-Reply-To: <3C9396F5.7319AB27@linux-m68k.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I wrote: > At http://www.xs4all.nl/~zippel/lc.tar.gz you can find a prototype for a > new linux configurator (see the included README for build/use > information). It has reached a point, where it's becoming usable and I > need some feedback on how/if to continue. There is a new version at http://www.xs4all.nl/~zippel/lc/lc-0.2.tar.gz, this version also works with qt2.x. So far I hadn't very much feedback. What's up? Is everyone suddenly completely happy with cml2? Now is your chance to evaluate the alternatives or does this require too much work before you can start flaming? bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/