Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753291AbZIROq3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:46:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750805AbZIROq3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:46:29 -0400 Received: from nbd.name ([88.198.39.176]:43106 "EHLO ds10.mine.nu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750802AbZIROq2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:46:28 -0400 Message-ID: <4AB39D3A.3000204@openwrt.org> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:46:18 +0200 From: Felix Fietkau User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Michael Buesch , Con Kolivas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements References: <20090906205952.GA6516@elte.hu> <20090907182629.GA3484@elte.hu> <20090908074825.GA11413@elte.hu> <200909081645.18505.mb@bu3sch.de> <20090918112454.GE9930@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20090918112454.GE9930@elte.hu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1471 Lines: 31 Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Michael Buesch wrote: > >> On Tuesday 08 September 2009 09:48:25 Ingo Molnar wrote: >> > Mind poking on this one to figure out whether it's all repeatable >> > and why that slowdown happens? >> >> I repeated the test several times, because I couldn't really believe >> that there's such a big difference for me, but the results were the >> same. I don't really know what's going on nor how to find out what's >> going on. > > Well that's a really memory constrained MIPS device with like 16 MB of > RAM or so? So having effects from small things like changing details in > a kernel image is entirely plausible. Normally changing small details doesn't have much of an effect. While 16 MB is indeed not that much, we do usually have around 8 MB free with a full user space running. Changes to other subsystems normally produce consistent and repeatable differences that seem entirely unrelated to memory use, so any measurable difference related to scheduler changes is unlikely to be related to the low amount of RAM. By the way, we do frequently also test the same software with devices that have more RAM, e.g. 32 or 64 MB and it usually behaves in a very similar way. - Felix -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/