Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758725AbZIRWDQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:03:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758704AbZIRWDJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:03:09 -0400 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:45969 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758702AbZIRWDJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:03:09 -0400 To: Kay Sievers Cc: Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20090917125759.GA4045@kroah.com> <20090917185306.GA28635@elte.hu> <1253238637.4071.10.camel@yio.site> <1253309513.1864.5.camel@yio.site> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:03:04 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1253309513.1864.5.camel@yio.site> (Kay Sievers's message of "Fri\, 18 Sep 2009 23\:31\:53 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-XM-SPF: eid=;;;mid=;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=76.21.114.89;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 76.21.114.89 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa03 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Kay Sievers X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Report: * -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG * -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa03 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 XM_SPF_Neutral SPF-Neutral * 0.4 UNTRUSTED_Relay Comes from a non-trusted relay Subject: Re: [bug] /etc/profile: line 30: /dev/null: Permission denied X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:26:12 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1285 Lines: 30 Kay Sievers writes: > On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 13:58 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> As a special case you can implement this much >> more simply in devtmpfs_mount just do: > > I sent the patch to Greg already. I like to keep the things in the > subsystem where the non-default names are set. The issue will come back > from the embedded guys, who want to do be able to do that for a few more > nodes and run their stuff completely without userspace /dev. We are also > sure never to touch anything we did not create. There are a lot of stupid expedient things that people making embedded products like to do. Tell them to write a 5 line /sbin/hotplug script. udev isn't too expensive to run on the embedded platforms, and if they have enough horse power in the system to run linux udev is almost certainly a possibility. > This change works for me here. Do you want to send or sign that off? :) Nope. I don't want any piece of ownership of devtmpfs. I have sent the only patch I am comfortable with. Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/