Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 02:05:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 02:05:04 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:63242 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 02:04:54 -0500 Message-ID: <3C959172.5080309@mandrakesoft.com> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 02:04:18 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020214 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Theodore Tso CC: Anton Blanchard , Gerrit Huizenga , lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] 7.52 second kernel compile In-Reply-To: <20020316061535.GA16653@krispykreme> <20020317123434.GE22387@krispykreme> <20020317170955.A491@thunk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Theodore Tso wrote: >On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 11:34:34PM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote: > >>>And this *without* the dcache_lock? Hmm. So you are saying there >>>may still be room for improvement? >>> >>I tried the dcache lock patches but found it hard to see a difference, >>for us the mm stuff still seems to be the bottleneck. >> > >Try the patch which gets rid of the BKL in ext2_get_block() --- if you >don't have that, let me know, I've got one kicking around that mostly >works except I haven't validated that it does the right thing if >quotas are enabled. > Is yours different from what's in 2.5.x? Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/