Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753627AbZIUHGm (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Sep 2009 03:06:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753328AbZIUHGm (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Sep 2009 03:06:42 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f199.google.com ([209.85.210.199]:45673 "EHLO mail-yx0-f199.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753052AbZIUHGl (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Sep 2009 03:06:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090920122411.GA5413@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20090919110316.GA23452@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20090920081550.GA830@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20090920122411.GA5413@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:06:42 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: Pass IFSR register to do_PrefetchAbort() From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Bityutskiy Artem , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Koskinen Aaro Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 764 Lines: 16 On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 12:35:19PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: >> Ok, so __do_page_fault() should know where we are: in data abort or in >> prefetch abort. What is right way to do it? Should we create one more >> argument or use one of reserved bits IFSR? > > Well, this is my solution to the problem - could you test it please? Yes, it works. But I still think that ignoring IFSR is a mistake. I'll send updated patches -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/