Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756478AbZIVMzm (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:55:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756396AbZIVMzl (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:55:41 -0400 Received: from gir.skynet.ie ([193.1.99.77]:58829 "EHLO gir.skynet.ie" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756329AbZIVMzk (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:55:40 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:55:46 +0100 From: Mel Gorman To: Sachin Sant Cc: Christoph Lameter , Nick Piggin , Pekka Enberg , heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Tejun Heo , Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Fix SLQB on memoryless configurations V2 Message-ID: <20090922125546.GA25965@csn.ul.ie> References: <1253549426-917-1-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> <20090921174656.GS12726@csn.ul.ie> <20090921180739.GT12726@csn.ul.ie> <4AB85A8F.6010106@in.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AB85A8F.6010106@in.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1873 Lines: 45 On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:33:11AM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote: > Mel Gorman wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 01:54:12PM -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote: >> >>> Lets just keep SLQB back until the basic issues with memoryless nodes are >>> resolved. >>> >> >> It's not even super-clear that the memoryless nodes issues are entirely >> related to SLQB. Sachin for example says that there was a stall issue >> with memoryless nodes that could be triggered without SLQB. Sachin, is >> that still accurate? >> > I think there are two different problems that we are dealing with. > > First one is the SLQB not working on a ppc64 box which seems to be specific > to only one machine and i haven't seen that on other power boxes.The patches > that you have posted seems to allow the box to boot, but eventually it hits > the stall issue(related to percpu dynamic allocator not working on ppc64), > which is the second problem we are dealing with. > Ok, I've sent out V3 of this. It's only a partial fix but it's about as far as it can be brought until the other difficulties are resolved. > The stall issue seems to be much more critical as it is affecting almost > all of the power boxes that i have tested with (4 in all). > This issue is seen with Linus tree as well and was first seen with > 2.6.31-git5 (0cb583fd..) > > The stall issue was reported here: > http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-September/075791.html > Can you bisect this please? -- Mel Gorman Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/