Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 11:39:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 11:38:52 -0500 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:20996 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 11:38:38 -0500 Message-ID: <3C9617BB.8030205@evision-ventures.com> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 17:37:15 +0100 From: Martin Dalecki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020311 X-Accept-Language: en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Christian_Borntr=E4ger?= CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: some ide-scsi commands starve drives on the same cable In-Reply-To: <3C95E7E3.4020300@evision-ventures.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christian Borntr?ger wrote: > Martin Dalecki wrote: > >>>There has been some movement forward in the standards on this. You might >>>want to ask our new 2.5 IDE maintainer if/when it will be implemented - I >>>suspect you have to wait a while though. There is much IDE to clean up >>>first >> >>Just for the record: I'm aware of it. > > > Good to hear that. > > But I guess this is future work and will never get into 2.4, right? It is future work yes. I don't intend to care about 2.4. Since the 2.4 is leaking the BIO stuff it will be quite hard to backport the IDE stuff if someone (not me) attempts to. > Bytheway, as you became the IDE maintainer for 2.5, who is the IDE maintainer > for 2.4? Andre? Yes. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/