Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751767AbZIWUIt (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:08:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751277AbZIWUIt (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:08:49 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f174.google.com ([209.85.211.174]:49109 "EHLO mail-yw0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751124AbZIWUIs convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:08:48 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=veBQe7miSeWYr309HL8WcRUFAg3gyMVfMfBl4ZVjvsbxY9j+ph6LPGOVklwfioNSDh H4bxj0/aEh8SAknuBu4Fy2vq9g1DS9KPn51759PwNlWM2CLnt9qaLu5M6NKDbNmzeLtq pKE2DYjV+0Oxt+WzhM4gMcVwAtqld3ZPuXins= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090923194957.GA19358@elte.hu> References: <1253132182.20020.242.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20090922.153201.225375909.davem@davemloft.net> <20090923114725.GB4132@elte.hu> <20090923.111444.247045711.davem@davemloft.net> <20090923193020.GA20934@elte.hu> <520f0cf10909231240g11f5cafei5cbb4ed494eba76d@mail.gmail.com> <20090923194957.GA19358@elte.hu> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:08:51 +0200 Message-ID: <520f0cf10909231308y7c82227cvf19a36ae59b6a6cb@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: mailing list for trace users From: John Kacur To: Ingo Molnar Cc: David Miller , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, fweisbec@gmail.com, acme@redhat.com, mhiramat@redhat.com, postmaster@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2957 Lines: 70 On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * John Kacur wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> > >> > * David Miller wrote: >> > >> >> From: Ingo Molnar >> >> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:47:25 +0200 >> >> >> >> > Could you please also create the linux-perf-users list, for perf >> >> > events and the perf tool related user questions? (We have asked for >> >> > this before but must have gotten lost somewhere) >> >> >> >> I think your communities are similar enough and small enough that you >> >> could share this list. >> > >> > It's two separate subsystems. There's a lot of non-tracing aspects of >> > performance events: it does profiling, counting, latency analysis, etc. >> > The tool is named 'perf', the subsystem is named 'performance events', >> > and the most typical workflows dont do any tracing. >> > >> > And i beg to differ about the size of the communities. It's just been >> > added upstream... >> > >> > Also, what is the policy for adding new lists to vger.kernel.org? If a >> > subsystem maintainer asks for a list named after a core kernel >> > subsystem, how frequently is it rejected, and on what basis? >> > >> > I find it sad that such an arbitrary looking negative decision from you >> > forces a user list away from vger. I wouldnt mind it to be closed if it >> > has no significant traffic after a year or lifetime or so - many vger >> > lists have almost no traffic to begin with. >> > >> > Also, i cannot help but to observe the fact that you've fought the >> > original perfcounters project in a very ugly and public way less >> > than a year ago. Dont you think that you 'deciding' this matter in >> > such a negative fashion is a conflict of interest? >> > >> > ? ? ? ?Ingo >> >> Yikes - Ingo, I don't want to spawn a long thread here about what to >> call the list, but as a native English speaker, I think that >> "linux-trace-users" sounds much nicer than "linux-tracing-users". > > That argument i can and will accept of course ... > > The "sorry, i ignored you twice and now it's unfortunately too late" > excuse given by David i will not ;-) > > Note that this mail you replied to was about > linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, which David refused to create, > suggesting that perf users should mail to > linux-trace-users@vger.kernel.org instead. (which is a curious argument > - if you use a tool named 'perf', or if you are using PAPI to count > events, would it occur to you to mail to that list?) > > ? ? ? ?Ingo > Oh, for that matter, as a user of both tracing and the perf tool, I think it IS appropriate to have separate lists. John -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/