Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752224AbZIWVqx (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:46:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751992AbZIWVqx (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:46:53 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:59323 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751014AbZIWVqw (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:46:52 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:46:42 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: LKML , Masami Hiramatsu , Steven Rostedt , Li Zefan Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] tracing/kprobes: Kprobes core/tracing/profiling updates Message-ID: <20090923214642.GA30061@elte.hu> References: <1253648302-5771-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <20090923105252.GA32176@elte.hu> <20090923212438.GA5190@nowhere> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090923212438.GA5190@nowhere> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1709 Lines: 56 * Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:52:52PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Would be nice to merge latest -git into this tree and resolve the > > conflicts: > > > > kernel/trace/Makefile > > kernel/trace/trace.h > > kernel/trace/trace_event_types.h > > kernel/trace/trace_export.c > > > > Then i could pull it into tip:tracing/kprobes for more testing. > > > > Ingo > > > I've just merged latest upstream tree into it and pushed > that in a new branch: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/random-tracing.git > tracing/kprobes-v2 Pulled into tip:tracing/kprobes, thanks Frederic! > There were several conflicts, not trivial. I hope I haven't missed > something. But it boots well, I've tested a simple kprobe creation > and fetched its events through perf without any problem. > > Thanks, > Frederic. > > PS: I'd recommend you to define a name when you define a kprobe. > For example if you want to get the first argument of sys_open, > don't create it using: > > p sys_open a0 > > but rather: > > p:my_probe_name sys_open a0 > > Otherwise you will get a default kprobe name that doesn't seem > to make perf trace happy (put in my TODO list). ok. Right now it's in a cooking branch, tracing/kprobes. I merged it to tip:master - we can propagate it to tracing/core once it's ready with all known bugs and quirks fixed and with significant perf functionality for it. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/