Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 15:37:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 15:37:13 -0500 Received: from zok.SGI.COM ([204.94.215.101]:39607 "EHLO zok.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 15:37:02 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 07:36:37 +1100 From: Nathan Scott To: Alan Cox , Shawn Starr Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.19-pre3-ac1 - Quotactl patch Message-ID: <20020319073637.N1601@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Shawn Starr wrote: > > Right, but which old patch 2.4.18-pre3-quotactl reversed against I assume you mean "2.4.18-pre3-ac2-quotactl.patch" from XFS CVS... this was an incremental patch against Alan's tree, as described in cmd/xfsmisc/README in the XFS CVS tree - it's not the right one to be using here, since we're trying to back out the quota changes in Alan's patches (a.k.a. Jan Kara's 32 bit uid/gid quota patches, at ftp://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/pub/local/jack/quota/v2.4/) > > 2.4.19-pre3-ac1 doesnt go out cleanly without patch complaining about > > unreversed patch problems. You would need to use the quota patch which is part of Alan's patches in order to get back to the base kernel quota, before applying Jan's new patches (which are patches against Linus'/Marcelo's kernels). Alan Cox wrote: > It isnt a single patch, its patches with further fixes on top. So, I'm starting to think the patch you need doesn't exist, Shawn... Previously I thought Alan simply used Jan's quota patches directly, but from what Alan's saying it sounds like that isn't correct and he has additional fixes which aren't in Jan's patches. (?) Anyway, I imagine you would still get most of the way there by reverse applying Jan's patch (quota-patch-2.4.17-3.diff in XFS CVS) and then fixing up any remaining issues by hand. You just need to get back to the base kernel quota as a starting point, because that's what Jan's "alpha" patches are against (we use these in the XFS CVS tree now). cheers. -- Nathan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/