Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 17:48:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 17:48:30 -0500 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.129]:35002 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 17:48:18 -0500 Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 14:44:51 -0800 From: Russ Weight To: Tim Hockin Cc: Manfred Spraul , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Scalable CPU bitmasks Message-ID: <20020318144451.A4377@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <001e01c1cecc$50c347f0$010411ac@local> <200203182242.g2IMgx119637@www.hockin.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Good point - I'll catch this at compile time. I'll resubmit shortly... - Russ On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 02:42:59PM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote: > > > NOTE: The cpumap_to_ulong() and cpumap_ulong_to_cpumap() interfaces > > > are provided specifically for migration. In their current > > > form, they call BUG() if NR_CPUS is defined to be greater > > > than the bit-size of (unsigned long). > > > > Why BUG? NR_CPUS is known at compile time, is there a reason why you > > can't use a call to an undefined function in order to get a link time > > error message? (like __bad_udelay in linux/asm-i386/udelay.h) > > why that, rather than #error ? > > -- Russ Weight (rweight@us.ibm.com) Linux Technology Center - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/