Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S293447AbSCSBdL>; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 20:33:11 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S293448AbSCSBdC>; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 20:33:02 -0500
Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:45246 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S293447AbSCSBcn>;
	Mon, 18 Mar 2002 20:32:43 -0500
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 17:29:20 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <20020318.172920.116873917.davem@redhat.com>
To: yodaiken@fsmlabs.com
Cc: pavel@suse.cz, lm@work.bitmover.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bitkeeper licence issues
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020318170031.A5276@hq.fsmlabs.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

   From: yodaiken@fsmlabs.com
   Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 17:00:31 -0700

   On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 12:14:28AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
   > By giving me binary-only installer you ask me to trust you. You ask me
   
   Then don't use it.
   
Seriously Pavel, Victor is right, simply don't use BitKeeper and GET
OVER IT already.  Larry doesn't force you to use BitKeeper, so don't
use it if you disagree with it and simply cope with that.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/