Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753052AbZI0A2q (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:28:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752904AbZI0A2q (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:28:46 -0400 Received: from taverner.CS.Berkeley.EDU ([128.32.168.222]:42544 "EHLO taverner.cs.berkeley.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752831AbZI0A2q (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:28:46 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Path: not-for-mail From: daw@cs.berkeley.edu (David Wagner) Newsgroups: isaac.lists.linux-kernel Subject: Re: [RFC] Privilege dropping security module Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 00:28:49 +0000 (UTC) Organization: University of California, Berkeley Message-ID: References: <20090923005644.GA28244@c.hsd1.tn.comcast.net> <20090925072248.GB9821@c.hsd1.tn.comcast.net> <20090926210958.GA23564@c.hsd1.tn.comcast.net> Reply-To: daw-news@cs.berkeley.edu (David Wagner) NNTP-Posting-Host: taverner.cs.berkeley.edu X-Trace: taverner.cs.berkeley.edu 1254011329 11366 128.32.168.222 (27 Sep 2009 00:28:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@taverner.cs.berkeley.edu NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 00:28:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001) Originator: daw@taverner.cs.berkeley.edu (David Wagner) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 572 Lines: 8 Andy Spencer wrote: >What would you suggest as a better specification language? Would it be >sufficient to have recursive and non recursive variants for masking >permissions? I haven't given it enough thought to recommend a better specification language. Having both recursive and non-recursive variants might do the trick. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/