Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 15:10:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 15:10:42 -0500 Received: from main.cyclades.com ([209.128.87.2]:56841 "EHLO cyclades.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 15:10:31 -0500 Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 11:40:02 -0800 (PST) From: Ivan Passos To: "Matthew G. Marsh" cc: Linux Kernel List , netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [RFC-2] Configuring Synchronous Interfaces in Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Matthew G. Marsh wrote: > > I would like to note an objection to using ifconfig to carry all of this. > For example I do not use or even have ifconfig on any of my systems as I > only use/need/want Alexey's ip utility to perform all of those tasks. > > I would rather have an independant utility that could set and check the > settings of all of these variables for whatever classes of networking > connections existed. This would provide a cleaner split between the > protocol configuration (IPv4, IPv6, IPX, ...) and the device (V.##, > 10/100, 4/16/100, etc) parameters. > > Such a split should make for a cleaner configuration structure WRT virtual > devices as well which for the most part deal with the protocol config and > do not need much device config. > > FWIW: Alexey's ip has replaced both ifconfig and route on my systems. > Something that could now replace having several different card config > utils around with one binary would be fantastic. Very good point IMHO. I'll have a look at ip to see if I can get ideas from it. Thanks for the info!! Later, Ivan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/