Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754463AbZI3QQz (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:16:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752329AbZI3QQy (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:16:54 -0400 Received: from mtagate4.de.ibm.com ([195.212.17.164]:50269 "EHLO mtagate4.de.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751970AbZI3QQx (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:16:53 -0400 Message-ID: <4AC38477.4070007@free.fr> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:16:55 +0200 From: Daniel Lezcano User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Smith CC: "Serge E. Hallyn" , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu, xemul@openvz.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/80] Kernel based checkpoint/restart [v18] References: <1253749920-18673-1-git-send-email-orenl@librato.com> <20090924154139.2a7dd5ec.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090928163704.GA3327@us.ibm.com> <4AC20BB8.4070509@free.fr> <87iqf0o5sf.fsf@caffeine.danplanet.com> In-Reply-To: <87iqf0o5sf.fsf@caffeine.danplanet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1400 Lines: 32 Dan Smith wrote: > DL> Ok for the restart, but for the checkpoint, how do you access the > DL> network setup from a process which belongs to another namespace > DL> context ? > > So far the discussion has led to the kernel dumping all of that > information on checkpoint, and then splitting it up into what can be > done by userspace on restart and what still needs to be in the kernel. > Ah, this was a discussion in the containers@ mailing list ? Sorry I missed it, I will look at the containers@ archives. If the checkpoint is done from the kernel, why the restart wouldn't be in the kernel too ? Do you have a list of what is restartable from userspace or from the kernel ? Is there any documentation about the statefile format I can use if I want to implement myself an userspace CR solution based on this kernel patchset ? > Similarly, the task structure is currently exported by the kernel on > checkpoint, but recreated in userspace on restart. > (I guess you meant tasks hierarchy/tree) Well I understand why this is done from userspace but I don't like the idea of digging in the statefile, but there's no accounting for taste :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/