Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754409AbZI3VBL (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:01:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754087AbZI3VBK (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:01:10 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:48930 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753764AbZI3VBJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:01:09 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:00:54 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Linus Torvalds , Arjan van de Ven , Martin Schwidefsky , Thomas Gleixner , John Stultz , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.32-rc1 Message-ID: <20090930210054.GD24862@elte.hu> References: <4AC2712C.4080901@gmail.com> <20090929232248.735bf4df@infradead.org> <20090930170754.0886ff2e@infradead.org> <4AC3BE89.3040708@gmail.com> <20090930204950.GB24862@elte.hu> <4AC3C562.6080306@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4AC3C562.6080306@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0002] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1117 Lines: 32 * Eric Dumazet wrote: > Ingo Molnar a ?crit : > >> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Eric Dumazet wrote: > >>> Yes, I provided following version in my first answer but apparently > >>> it was too complex :) > > > > Yeah, i too missed it while reading through the thread. > > > > Ingo > > Well, I was refering to Arjan answer, not Linus/Ingo ones, and Arjan > did read my answer and said it was buggy... Its not a problem I dont > have 486 here anyway :) I picked up the improvement that is in your version nevertheless. Even if it doesnt matter in practice we dont drop good code :) > You are all obviously right, I should more carefuly edit mails before > hit 'Envoyer' button. It happens. Since email on lkml is the precursor to real code, one should generally treat it with the same high level of taste you treat the final code with. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/