Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756826AbZIRQuk (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:50:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756451AbZIRQuZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:50:25 -0400 Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.145]:36682 "EHLO e5.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756387AbZIRQuT (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:50:19 -0400 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, josh@joshtriplett.org, dvhltc@us.ibm.com, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/3] Fix thinko in commit #de078d875, actually initialize full tree Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:50:19 -0700 Message-Id: <125329262011-git-send-email-> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.5.2.5 In-Reply-To: <20090918164955.GA22272@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20090918164955.GA22272@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Paul E. McKenney Commit #de078d875 repeatedly and incorrectly initializes the root rcu_node structure's ->gpnum field rather than initializing the ->gpnum field of each node in the tree. Fix this. Also add an additional consistency check to catch this in the future. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney --- kernel/rcutree.c | 11 ++++------- kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c index 30e0e91..dd6e743 100644 --- a/kernel/rcutree.c +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c @@ -596,8 +596,6 @@ rcu_start_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long flags) { struct rcu_data *rdp = rsp->rda[smp_processor_id()]; struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp); - struct rcu_node *rnp_cur; - struct rcu_node *rnp_end; if (!cpu_needs_another_gp(rsp, rdp)) { spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags); @@ -654,13 +652,12 @@ rcu_start_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long flags) * one corresponding to this CPU, due to the fact that we have * irqs disabled. */ - rnp_end = &rsp->node[NUM_RCU_NODES]; - for (rnp_cur = &rsp->node[0]; rnp_cur < rnp_end; rnp_cur++) { - spin_lock(&rnp_cur->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */ + for (rnp = &rsp->node[0]; rnp < &rsp->node[NUM_RCU_NODES]; rnp++) { + spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */ rcu_preempt_check_blocked_tasks(rnp); - rnp_cur->qsmask = rnp_cur->qsmaskinit; + rnp->qsmask = rnp->qsmaskinit; rnp->gpnum = rsp->gpnum; - spin_unlock(&rnp_cur->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */ + spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */ } rsp->signaled = RCU_SIGNAL_INIT; /* force_quiescent_state now OK. */ diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h index a2d586c..55c6497 100644 --- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h +++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h @@ -476,10 +476,12 @@ static void rcu_print_task_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp) /* * Because there is no preemptable RCU, there can be no readers blocked, - * so there is no need to check for blocked tasks. + * so there is no need to check for blocked tasks. So check only for + * bogus qsmask values. */ static void rcu_preempt_check_blocked_tasks(struct rcu_node *rnp) { + WARN_ON_ONCE(rnp->qsmask); } /* -- 1.5.2.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/