Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757524AbZJBKBe (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2009 06:01:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757488AbZJBKBd (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2009 06:01:33 -0400 Received: from Cpsmtpm-eml106.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.10]:59530 "EHLO CPSMTPM-EML106.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757485AbZJBKBd (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2009 06:01:33 -0400 From: Frans Pop To: Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [Bug #14141] order 2 page allocation failures in iwlagn Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 12:01:32 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Pekka Enberg , Reinette Chatre , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Karol Lewandowski References: <3onW63eFtRF.A.xXH.oMTxKB@chimera> <200910021111.55749.elendil@planet.nl> <20091002093226.GJ21906@csn.ul.ie> In-Reply-To: <20091002093226.GJ21906@csn.ul.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200910021201.35672.elendil@planet.nl> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Oct 2009 10:01:35.0782 (UTC) FILETIME=[5399FC60:01CA4347] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1393 Lines: 29 On Friday 02 October 2009, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 11:11:52AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > My own feeling is that Bartlomiej is correct and that something has > > changed since .29 and that on average we do have less higher order > > areas available after the system has been in use for some time, but I > > can't substantiate that. I do know that before .30 I had never seen > > the SKB allocation errors. > > > > Main problem is that it's hard to deliberately and reproducibly get > > the system in a state where the errors occur. > > Apparently, Karol Lewandowski (cc added) has a reliable > reproduction case for when the firmware loading problem occurs > (http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/30/242). While it's not the same problem > exactly, it's probable they're related. I'm hoping the problem commit > can be identified by his bisection whenever he gets around to it. That does indeed look like a third independent report for basically the same issue. > [...], I accept that the problem is apparently occuring more now than it > did so something has changed that is not obvious to normal testing. Cool, that's progress ;-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/