Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757543AbZJBRQB (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2009 13:16:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757509AbZJBRP7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2009 13:15:59 -0400 Received: from smtp2.ultrahosting.com ([74.213.174.253]:48822 "EHLO smtp.ultrahosting.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753645AbZJBRP6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2009 13:15:58 -0400 Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 13:10:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@gentwo.org To: Tejun Heo cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: [this_cpu_xx V4 00/20] Introduce per cpu atomic operations and avoid per cpu address arithmetic In-Reply-To: <4AC5C836.8000502@kernel.org> Message-ID: References: <20091001212521.123389189@gentwo.org> <4AC5C836.8000502@kernel.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 821 Lines: 21 On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, Tejun Heo wrote: > cl@linux-foundation.org wrote: > > V3->V4: > > - Fix various macro definitions. > > - Provider experimental percpu based fastpath that does not disable > > interrupts for SLUB. > > The series looks very good to me. percpu#for-next now has ia64 bits > included and the legacy allocator is gone there so it can carry this > series. Sans the last one, they seem they can be stable and > incremental from now on, right? Shall I include this series into the > percpu tree? You can include all but the last patch that is experimental. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/