Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758087AbZJBShF (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2009 14:37:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757476AbZJBShF (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2009 14:37:05 -0400 Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:51940 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755676AbZJBShD (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2009 14:37:03 -0400 Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 14:36:49 -0400 From: Theodore Tso To: Jens Axboe Cc: Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Mike Galbraith , Vivek Goyal , Ulrich Lukas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, nauman@google.com, dpshah@google.com, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, mikew@google.com, fchecconi@gmail.com, paolo.valente@unimore.it, ryov@valinux.co.jp, fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp, jmoyer@redhat.com, dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, righi.andrea@gmail.com, m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com, agk@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org, jmarchan@redhat.com, riel@redhat.com Subject: Re: IO scheduler based IO controller V10 Message-ID: <20091002183649.GE8161@mit.edu> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Tso , Jens Axboe , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Mike Galbraith , Vivek Goyal , Ulrich Lukas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, nauman@google.com, dpshah@google.com, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, mikew@google.com, fchecconi@gmail.com, paolo.valente@unimore.it, ryov@valinux.co.jp, fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp, jmoyer@redhat.com, dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, righi.andrea@gmail.com, m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com, agk@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org, jmarchan@redhat.com, riel@redhat.com References: <20091002145610.GD31616@kernel.dk> <20091002171129.GG31616@kernel.dk> <20091002172046.GA2376@elte.hu> <20091002172554.GJ31616@kernel.dk> <20091002172842.GA4884@elte.hu> <20091002173732.GK31616@kernel.dk> <20091002175629.GA14860@elte.hu> <20091002180437.GL31616@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091002180437.GL31616@kernel.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@mit.edu X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 942 Lines: 20 On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 08:04:37PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > > i'd say 'latency' describes it even better. 'interactivity' as a term is > > a bit overladen. > > I'm not too crazy about it either. How about just using 'desktop' since > this is obviously what we are really targetting? 'latency' isn't fully > descriptive either, since it may not necessarily provide the best single > IO latency (noop would). As Linus has already pointed out, it's not necessarily "desktop" versus "server". There will be certain high frequency transaction database workloads (for example) that will very much care about latency. I think "low_latency" may be the best term to use. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/