Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753655AbZJCHX7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Oct 2009 03:23:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753275AbZJCHX6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Oct 2009 03:23:58 -0400 Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([93.163.65.50]:56132 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752827AbZJCHX6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Oct 2009 03:23:58 -0400 Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 09:24:01 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Mike Galbraith Cc: Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Vivek Goyal , Ulrich Lukas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, nauman@google.com, dpshah@google.com, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, mikew@google.com, fchecconi@gmail.com, paolo.valente@unimore.it, ryov@valinux.co.jp, fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp, jmoyer@redhat.com, dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, righi.andrea@gmail.com, m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com, agk@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org, jmarchan@redhat.com, riel@redhat.com Subject: Re: IO scheduler based IO controller V10 Message-ID: <20091003072401.GV31616@kernel.dk> References: <20091002171129.GG31616@kernel.dk> <20091002172046.GA2376@elte.hu> <20091002172554.GJ31616@kernel.dk> <20091002172842.GA4884@elte.hu> <20091002173732.GK31616@kernel.dk> <1254507215.8667.7.camel@marge.simson.net> <20091002181903.GN31616@kernel.dk> <1254548931.8299.18.camel@marge.simson.net> <1254549378.8299.21.camel@marge.simson.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1254549378.8299.21.camel@marge.simson.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2327 Lines: 54 On Sat, Oct 03 2009, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 07:49 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 20:19 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > > > If you could do a cleaned up version of your overload patch based on > > > this: > > > > > > http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-2.6-block.git;a=commit;h=1d2235152dc745c6d94bedb550fea84cffdbf768 > > > > > > then lets take it from there. > > Note to self: build the darn thing after last minute changes. > > Block: Delay overloading of CFQ queues to improve read latency. > > Introduce a delay maximum dispatch timestamp, and stamp it when: > 1. we encounter a known seeky or possibly new sync IO queue. > 2. the current queue may go idle and we're draining async IO. > 3. we have sync IO in flight and are servicing an async queue. > 4 we are not the sole user of disk. > Disallow exceeding quantum if any of these events have occurred recently. > > Protect this behavioral change with a "desktop_dispatch" knob and default > it to "on".. providing an easy means of regression verification prior to > hate-mail dispatch :) to CC list. It still doesn't build: block/cfq-iosched.c: In function ?cfq_dispatch_requests?: block/cfq-iosched.c:1345: error: ?max_delay? undeclared (first use in this function) After shutting down the computer yesterday, I was thinking a bit about this issue and how to solve it without incurring too much delay. If we add a stricter control of the depth, that may help. So instead of allowing up to max_quantum (or larger) depths, only allow gradual build up of that the farther we get away from a dispatch from the sync IO queues. For example, when switching to an async or seeky sync queue, initially allow just 1 in flight. For the next round, if there still hasn't been sync activity, allow 2, then 4, etc. If we see sync IO queue again, immediately drop to 1. It could tie in with (or partly replace) the overload feature. The key to good latency and decent throughput is knowing when to allow queue build up and when not to. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/