Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932235AbZJCOBG (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Oct 2009 10:01:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932179AbZJCOBF (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Oct 2009 10:01:05 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:40793 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932176AbZJCOBE (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Oct 2009 10:01:04 -0400 Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 16:00:58 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Matti Aarnio , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: ftrace WARNING during boot Message-ID: <20091003140058.GA20867@elte.hu> References: <20091003105318.GB32486@mea-ext.zmailer.org> <20091003110002.GA6162@nowhere> <20091003112850.GC32486@mea-ext.zmailer.org> <20091003120046.GC6366@nowhere> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091003120046.GC6366@nowhere> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1658 Lines: 43 * Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 02:28:50PM +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 01:00:03PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 01:53:18PM +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote: > > > > This is perhaps already fixed, as I have two a bit newer kernels than this one, > > > > but reporting is better than being silent.. > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Which kernel is this? Does it happen in the current 2.6.32-rc1 ? > > > > I do know that reading the trace is difficult, but the asked for information > > is down in there. Intentionally put there by the kernel-oops coders, I presume. > > > Ah ok. It's just that I'm not that familiar with fedora's kernels naming :-) > > > > I do use vendor kernels, and Fedora 12 beta program has not yet made > > 2.6.32-rc1 kernel available. > > > > However this does not appear in 2.6.31.1-56.fc12.x86_64 kernel that > > is lattest from vendor, but there I have some other troubles why I > > took a bit older kernel. (Other troubles with the xfs filesystem > > lock handling.) > > So this looks based on a 2.6.31.1 kernel, more stable. And if it > doesn't happen with it, then it's fine. > > That said, it's all about fedora based kernel so it's a bit hard to > tell if it came from fedora adds or vanilla kernel code. Fedora generally doesnt modify any ftrace details. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/