Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756534AbZJDA6e (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Oct 2009 20:58:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755380AbZJDA6e (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Oct 2009 20:58:34 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.221.173]:56833 "EHLO mail-qy0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755106AbZJDA6d (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Oct 2009 20:58:33 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=SvgENYAa7YLfXPXcFAEOzhZCYGUxDP3my4grvshu2tyMJkL323TcHXMuuKym65sL6Y 2EOjYNehkMUG62rWu311AWeO6EUV8AGXcmM3bv6r9O1xnNdCIeSC8n/hJ6ldD81mkPdP zotNqLl0q6Q7irMDwen5uiJhsUBbfANT7Zj9w= Message-ID: <4AC7F306.2040409@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 18:57:42 -0600 From: Robert Hancock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090922 Fedora/3.0-2.7.b4.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Fries CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, d.stussy@yahoo.com, Joao Ramos , Linus Torvalds , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [bisected] 2.6.31 regression sis5513 PIO Mode 0 hang References: <20091003025415.GA28295@spacedout.fries.net> In-Reply-To: <20091003025415.GA28295@spacedout.fries.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1193 Lines: 23 On 10/02/2009 08:54 PM, David Fries wrote: > I just did a git bisection from 2.6.30 to 2.6.31 because 2.6.31 will > not boot on this system. d.stussy@yahoo.com's post September 12th > looks the same, different CPU but both have sis5513 IDE chips. His > would normally init the ethernet chip next, mine would do PS/2 next, > both hang right after the Uniform CD-ROM message. > > This was bisected down to chaging PIO mode 0 for probing. What > problem was that patch trying to solve? Reverting just that patch at > the top of 2.6.31 tree works. I can test patches. > > Assigned bugzilla.kernel.org bug 14310 Well, it's the right thing to do (libata does it) but presumably doing that in old IDE is triggering some kind of bug. Unless there's a specific problem it was solving, or someone is interested in debugging in detail (I'm certainly not interested in drivers/ide) it should likely be reverted as we've done without it for so long.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/