Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 00:24:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 00:24:00 -0500 Received: from cs24344-28.austin.rr.com ([24.243.44.28]:30472 "EHLO explorer.dummynet") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 00:23:41 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 23:23:36 -0600 From: Dan Hopper To: Andre Hedrick Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Promise 20265 IDE chip gets detected in wrong order 2.4.x Message-ID: <20020320052336.GA2220@yoda.dummynet> Mail-Followup-To: Dan Hopper , Andre Hedrick , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020320045535.GA2242@yoda.dummynet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andre Hedrick remarked: > > append="ide=reverse" You're right, this works, too, and is a lot easier to remember than the override I used before. > Various Mainboard manufacturers do things to place the FAKE-RAID in front > of the the legacy south bridge. This is classic Windows spoofing. > > > PDC20265: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 68 > > VP_IDE: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 89 So, the I/O port assignments don't in fact properly determine the assignment order? I'm gathering from what you're saying that the current behavior is related to PCI bus location? Thanks, Dan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/