Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 03:35:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 03:35:34 -0500 Received: from gate.perex.cz ([194.212.165.105]:58888 "EHLO gate.perex.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 03:35:28 -0500 Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 09:30:51 +0100 (CET) From: Jaroslav Kysela X-X-Sender: To: J Sloan cc: "Wayne.Brown@altec.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: 2.5.7 make modules_install error (oss) In-Reply-To: <3C97889B.6060301@lexus.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, J Sloan wrote: > Agreed, the oss drivers should _at least_ > be maintained as an alternative, e.g. for > those of us who want reliable sound with > *low latency* > > > I haven't checked lately, but not too long > ago the alsa drivers were found to be one > of the worst sources of latency in the kernel. > You should really take care about your words. You've not written any technical reason to say these sentences. We are not aware about any problems against low-latency. Sure, OSS API emulation is only emulation, so there is additional layer which can be a bit slower than simplified native OSS drivers, but using ALSA API, we get really serious latencies even for multichannel hardware. I propose to join to our efford and fix (or at least - point to) problems (if any) in ALSA drivers. Thanks. Jaroslav ----- Jaroslav Kysela Linux Kernel Sound Maintainer ALSA Project http://www.alsa-project.org SuSE Linux http://www.suse.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/