Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755995AbZJFEp1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2009 00:45:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752965AbZJFEp0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2009 00:45:26 -0400 Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5]:38337 "EHLO grelber.thyrsus.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751733AbZJFEp0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2009 00:45:26 -0400 From: Rob Landley Organization: Boundaries Unlimited To: berk walker Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] md: drivers/md/unroll.pl replaced with awk analog Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 23:44:46 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.2 (Linux/2.6.28-15-generic; KDE/4.2.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Vladimir Dronnikov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, neilb@suse.de References: <4aca1863.0a1ad00a.33bf.1017@mx.google.com> <200910051630.51039.rob@landley.net> <4ACA87DA.7000607@panix.com> In-Reply-To: <4ACA87DA.7000607@panix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200910052344.46809.rob@landley.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1657 Lines: 47 On Monday 05 October 2009 18:57:14 berk walker wrote: > Rob Landley wrote: > > On Monday 05 October 2009 11:01:39 Vladimir Dronnikov wrote: > >> From: Vladimir Dronnikov > >> > >> drivers/md/unroll.pl replaced by awk script to drop build-time > >> dependency on perl > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Dronnikov > > > > Acked-by: Rob Landley > > > > We already discussed this on another mailing list, thread starts at: > > > > http://lists.impactlinux.com/pipermail/firmware-impactlinux.com/2009-Octo > >ber/000328.html > > > > I've added this as patch #4 in the perl removal series I've submitted > > during the last few merge windows. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Rob > > Why is perl being removed? [I know that I have missed a lot] > berk- Before 2.6.25 the kernel build had never used perl, and the first perl removal patches were submitted for 2.6.26, so the real question is "why was it added, and was it worth it?" There was a long thread on an earlier submission of the patches, which Alan Cox concluded (as far as I'm concerned, unless Linus, Andrew Morton, or maybe Al Viro want to weigh in) with this post: http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0901.1/02108.html Archives are linked from there, you might have to check adjacent weeks too. Rob -- Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/