Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753635AbZJFGt7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2009 02:49:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751056AbZJFGt6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2009 02:49:58 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:52847 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750834AbZJFGt5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2009 02:49:57 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:49:19 +0200 From: Nick Piggin To: Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ravikiran G Thirumalai , Peter Zijlstra , Linus Torvalds , Jens Axboe Subject: Latest vfs scalability patch Message-ID: <20091006064919.GB30316@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 859 Lines: 23 Hi, Several people have been interested to test my vfs patches, so rather than resend patches I have uploaded a rollup against Linus's current head. ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/npiggin/patches/fs-scale/ I have used ext2,ext3,autofs4,nfs as well as in-memory filesystems OK (although this doesn't mean there are no bugs!). Otherwise, if your filesystem compiles, then there is a reasonable chance of it working, or ask me and I can try updating it for the new locking. I would be interested in seeing any numbers people might come up with, including single-threaded performance. Thanks, Nick -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/