Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758137AbZJFR5n (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:57:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932407AbZJFR5m (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:57:42 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:19411 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756966AbZJFR5l (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:57:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland McGrath To: Oleg Nesterov X-Fcc: ~/Mail/linus Cc: Andrew Morton , Sukadev Bhattiprolu , Daniel Lezcano , Sukadev Bhattiprolu , Linux Containers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] signals: SEND_SIG_NOINFO should be considered as SI_FROMUSER() In-Reply-To: Oleg Nesterov's message of Tuesday, 6 October 2009 15:37:32 +0200 <20091006133732.GB8628@redhat.com> References: <4AC608BE.9020805@fr.ibm.com> <20091003171029.GA30442@us.ibm.com> <20091004021844.GA21006@redhat.com> <20091004021918.GB21006@redhat.com> <20091006073100.4184128@magilla.sf.frob.com> <20091006133732.GB8628@redhat.com> X-Antipastobozoticataclysm: Bariumenemanilow Message-Id: <20091006175705.6547A22@magilla.sf.frob.com> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:57:05 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 571 Lines: 15 > Perhaps, we should add the comment to explain that both SI_FROMUSER() > and si_fromuser() are only valid in the sending pathes. Yes. Also now that you put them both in a sentence together, it is clear that it is insane to have two different things with those two names that differ only in capitalization. Thanks, Roland -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/