Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758121AbZJFUQu (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:16:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757424AbZJFUQu (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:16:50 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:23120 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757278AbZJFUQt convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:16:49 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,514,1249282800"; d="scan'208";a="733597160" From: "Kay, Allen M" To: Chris Wright CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org" , "matthew@wil.cx" Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:15:54 -0700 Subject: RE: [PATCH ACS v3 1/1] Thread-Topic: [PATCH ACS v3 1/1] Thread-Index: AcpCNPS8MdEpINI1Q7SbW6/Glb9OjAD55rVg Message-ID: <57C9024A16AD2D4C97DC78E552063EA3E302232D@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <1253231193-5753-1-git-send-email-allen.m.kay@intel.com> <20090929000041.GB3958@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <57C9024A16AD2D4C97DC78E552063EA3E2EA3B70@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com> <20090929184650.GF3958@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <57C9024A16AD2D4C97DC78E552063EA3E2F0411F@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com> <20091001011721.GK3958@sequoia.sous-sol.org> In-Reply-To: <20091001011721.GK3958@sequoia.sous-sol.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1534 Lines: 37 > I was thinking that ACS could be enabled if an IOMMU is enabled. Not a > perfect fit, but seems reasonably close. Chris, I'm working on a new version of the patch that incorporates iommu check. I'm also adding a check for dom0 kernel as HW iommu is not visible to dom0. Allen -----Original Message----- From: Chris Wright [mailto:chrisw@sous-sol.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 6:17 PM To: Kay, Allen M Cc: Chris Wright; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org; matthew@wil.cx Subject: Re: [PATCH ACS v3 1/1] * Kay, Allen M (allen.m.kay@intel.com) wrote: > On the other hand, can we say VT-d PT mode is mainly for KVM > virtualization use case? If so, is it reasonable to say performance of > host P2P in this mode is not of highest priority? Guess it depends on the workload. Would be helpful to identify a use case that is p2p heavy (and then the impact of enabling ACS). > If not, another option is to have a kernel boot parameter to > configure an kernel boot instance to be either host kernel optimized or > virtualization optimized. I don't know whether this is a reasonable or > not ... I was thinking that ACS could be enabled if an IOMMU is enabled. Not a perfect fit, but seems reasonably close. thanks, -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/