Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759322AbZJGO2F (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:28:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759268AbZJGO2E (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:28:04 -0400 Received: from fifo99.com ([67.223.236.141]:53706 "EHLO fifo99.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759227AbZJGO2D (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:28:03 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] checkpatch: add a blacklist From: Daniel Walker To: Krzysztof Halasa Cc: Andy Whitcroft , Li Zefan , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt In-Reply-To: References: <1253585691-10987-1-git-send-email-dwalker@fifo99.com> <1253585691-10987-2-git-send-email-dwalker@fifo99.com> <1253585691-10987-3-git-send-email-dwalker@fifo99.com> <4AB86ED1.1040200@cn.fujitsu.com> <20090930152708.GD2957@shadowen.org> <1254406711.18167.88.camel@desktop> <1254887534.18167.253.camel@desktop> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 07:26:57 -0700 Message-Id: <1254925617.18167.262.camel@desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1277 Lines: 33 On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 12:17 +0200, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > Daniel Walker writes: > > > This thread is specifically about checkpatch errors .. checkpatch > > warnings can be ignored, but errors you can't usually ignore.. > > Of course I can and do :-) > > > If your > > ignoring errors then either checkpatch is producing bogus output that > > needs to be corrected, or it's something you really should fix.. > > Neither. > But unfortunately I don't have examples handy. > > My POV must be a bit different: I treat errors like another class of > warnings (perhaps more important that "mere" warnings but still not > authoritative). >From my perspective Documentation/SubmittingPatches really dictates what you should be doing with checkpatch, since that was signed off on by Andy (on this thread) and Linus .. In that document I think checkpatch is given authority, rather than what your suggesting where it's just something you can use or not, and ignore or not like it has no meaning at all.. Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/