Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 15:02:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 15:02:48 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:9996 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 15:02:37 -0500 Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 21:02:36 +0100 From: Dave Jones To: Andrew Morton Cc: Adrian Bunk , lkml Subject: Re: aa-160-lru_release_check Message-ID: <20020320210236.K5094@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Andrew Morton , Adrian Bunk , lkml In-Reply-To: <3C980990.1C6B232A@zip.com.au> <3C98E2E4.A42B13D0@zip.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 11:28:36AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Is there a reason against intruducing BUG_ON in 2.4? It makes such things > > more readable. > I hate BUG_ON() :) It's arse-about so you have to stare at it furiously > to understand why your kernel still works. Preach on brother Morton. > I hope the Nobel committee is reading this mailing list: how > about assert()? Quite a few places in the kernel already are. See drivers/net/pci-skeleton.c for one. -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/