Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 15:33:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 15:33:37 -0500 Received: from marc1.theaimsgroup.com ([63.238.77.171]:35598 "EHLO mailer.progressive-comp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 15:33:30 -0500 Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 15:33:29 -0500 Message-Id: <200203202033.PAA18847@mailer.progressive-comp.com> From: Hank Leininger Reply-To: Hank Leininger To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: 2.2.20 oops during fsck, mylex 352 (DAC960), CONFIG_3GB X-Shameless-Plug: Check out http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/ X-Warning: This mail posted via a web gateway at marc.theaimsgroup.com X-Warning: Report any violation of list policy to abuse@progressive-comp.com X-Posted-By: Hank Leininger Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Are there any known issues with 2.2's deliberately-partially-disabled 3GB physical-RAM support (#define PAGE_OFFSET_RAW 0x40000000 in page_offset.h) and either the DAC960 driver, or e2fsck v1.22 ? I've ended up (because of a comedy of RMA-related errors) with 3 1GB DIMMs for a new server, when I'd originally planned only 2. For several reasons I'd like to stick to 2.2 for a bit longer. But to get 3GB support in 2.2 I had to "complete" the CONFIG_3GB config option, and thinking that I knew what I was doing, started smacking the box around. Everything seemed solid, until I killed the box with 8k NFS (I think--was getting >10mbytes/sec writes before the lockup though :). That's not the problem I'm worrying about now, though :-P Upon reboot+fsck, while I cursed myself for not yet having converted to ext3, the box oops'ed. It isn't local to me and doesn't have a serial console yet, so it was rebooted w/o recording the oops info. Now, I'm *hoping* there's a known or easily-identifiable issue with either the DAC960 driver, or (less likely) with e2fsck, when running with PAGE_OFFSET_RAW 0x40000000. If so, then I'll take the doctor's advice and won't do that. If not, then I may have *another* problem[1]. So, someone please tell me this is a known problem ;) OTOH, glancing through source for the DAC960 driver and for fsck I don't see anything that looks like it would care about PAGE_OFFSET. And, CONFIG_2GB seems to be solid. Is anyone running a similar configuration who has *not* had these problems? [1] I will first suspect a hardware problem. This is all for a replacement server to upgrade the one that runs MARC. In the 4 months since I bought all the hardware, nearly half of the components--all high-end, supposedly high-quality, certianly expensive--have failed, or were simply DOA. I hate hardware. Thanks, Hank Leininger - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/