Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758535AbZJHPVZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Oct 2009 11:21:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758497AbZJHPVY (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Oct 2009 11:21:24 -0400 Received: from cpsmtpm-eml104.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.8]:59122 "EHLO CPSMTPM-EML104.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758489AbZJHPVX (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Oct 2009 11:21:23 -0400 From: Frans Pop To: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.32-rc3 Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 17:20:44 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: mingo@elte.hu, hohndel@infradead.org, lenb@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1254797502.14122.146.camel@dhohndel-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com> <20091006144449.GA23078@elte.hu> <20091006144449.GA23078@elte.hu> In-reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200910081720.45850.elendil@planet.nl> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Oct 2009 15:20:45.0491 (UTC) FILETIME=[E8323030:01CA482A] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1593 Lines: 36 Linus Torvalds wrote: > Once you start believing the lie, suddenly all the subtrees will start > thinking that now _their_ kernel versions are bad, so now they'll start > to want to make the same idiotic changes to their Makefiles, or maybe > they'll decide that they don't want to pull tagged releases, but the "one > after the tag so that they'll get the updated Makefile". After sleeping on it and letting it percolate a bit I understand this argument better, and accept it. I'll continue to increase SUBLEVEL and add -rc0 for my own builds though, as IMHO it still makes perfect sense for versioning and managing installed kernel packages. The conclusion for me is: if anyone wants -rc0, simply apply it locally. I don't see myself ever using AUTOVERSION. The reason is that I don't want the files in /boot and dirs in /lib/modules/ to include the commit ID. For me the kernel *version* is what's defined in the Makefile (plus any localversion extentions). That's how I want it installed. The AUTOVERSION part is a *revision*: an update to the tagged version. (I don't expect you to agree with this.) So, unless it is made possible to include AUTOVERSION in the kernel and display it in dmesg and as part of the full 'uname -a' info *without* it becoming part of 'uname -r', it is not a usable option for me. Sorry. Cheers, FJP -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/