Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 00:19:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 00:18:52 -0500 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:38643 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 00:18:41 -0500 Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 21:20:08 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk To: Bergs Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: The network performance of linux Message-ID: <20020321052008.GA2871@matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Bergs , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020321051219.9811.qmail@web14510.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 09:12:19PM -0800, Bergs wrote: > > I work on a linux 2.2.14 kernel to test the network > throughput of a linux box used as a firewall. > > I find that when the IP packet length is 512B,the > throughput is the highest 71%. IP packet length is > smaller than 512B or bigger than 512B,the throughput > is the lower. > > I don't know why this ? Can I have some solutions > to improve the throughput of linux box ? > > You'll need to post much more info about your hardware. start with lspci and /proc/cpuinfo... Also you didn't say how fast each packet size actually was, and did you use a switch or what other type of network hardware. Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/