Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 04:06:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 04:05:52 -0500 Received: from mail.webmaster.com ([216.152.64.131]:18569 "EHLO shell.webmaster.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 04:05:50 -0500 From: David Schwartz To: , X-Mailer: PocoMail 2.51 (1003) - Registered Version Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 01:05:47 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20020321051219.9811.qmail@web14510.mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: The network performance of linux Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-ID: <20020321090548.AAA17336@shell.webmaster.com@whenever> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 21:12:19 -0800 (PST), Bergs wrote: >I work on a linux 2.2.14 kernel to test the network >throughput of a linux box used as a firewall. >I find that when the IP packet length is 512B,the >throughput is the highest 71%. IP packet length is >smaller than 512B or bigger than 512B,the throughput >is the lower. >I don't know why this ? Can I have some solutions >to improve the throughput of linux box ? I don't understand what you're measuring. Are you using TCP or UDP? If UDP, what exactly are you measuring? If TCP, how are you changing the packet size? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/