Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756258AbZJLLZt (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:25:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754543AbZJLLZt (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:25:49 -0400 Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:55511 "EHLO out1.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753549AbZJLLZr (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:25:47 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: 1hUblXRZ35uvbsykrbTuJ2oqxflbEpx+eDpfvOjAfdBS 1255346710 Message-ID: <4AD31213.6020006@imap.cc> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:25:07 +0200 From: Tilman Schmidt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de-AT; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 SeaMonkey/1.1.18 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Miller CC: tilman@imap.cc, johannes@sipsolutions.net, hidave.darkstar@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org Subject: Re: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08 References: <4AD1BF06.3050103@phoenixsoftware.de> <1255261251.4095.143.camel@johannes.local> <4AD2E8C8.4060205@imap.cc> <20091012.033246.56701176.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20091012.033246.56701176.davem@davemloft.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1947 Lines: 51 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 03:32:46 -0700 (PDT), David Miller wrote: > The PPP receive paths in ppp_generic.c do a local_bh_disable()/ > local_bh_enable() around packet receiving (via ppp_recv_lock()/ > ppp_recv_unlock() in ppp_do_recv). > > So at least that part is perfectly fine. > > ppp_input(), as called from ppp_sync_process(), also disables BH's > around ppp_do_recv() calls (via read_lock_bh()/read_unlock_bh()). > > So that's fine too. > > Do you have a bug report or are you just scanning around looking > for trouble? :-) I have encountered the message in the subject during a test of the Gigaset CAPI driver, and would like to determine whether it's a bug in the driver, a bug somewhere else, or no bug at all. The test scenario was PPP over ISDN with pppd+capiplugin. In an alternative scenario, also PPP over ISDN but with smpppd+capidrv, the message did not occur. Johannes' answer pointed me to the netif_rx() function. The Gigaset driver itself doesn't call that function at all. In the scenario where I saw the message, it was the SYNC_PPP line discipline that did. But from your explanation I gather that the cause cannot lie there. So now I'm looking for other possible causes of that message. - -- Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc Bonn, Germany Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits. Unge?ffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe R?ckseite) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFK0xITQ3+did9BuFsRAmXGAKCIiqJffUnuKw9rPjxHwbj9AnXOigCdGgS9 MpxRNGs0A4GTydYJaylbjyo= =LFxi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/