Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932529AbZJLPDT (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:03:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757009AbZJLPDS (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:03:18 -0400 Received: from smtp2.ultrahosting.com ([74.213.174.253]:58817 "EHLO smtp.ultrahosting.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756683AbZJLPDR (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:03:17 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:55:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@gentwo.org To: Pekka Enberg cc: Tejun Heo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mathieu Desnoyers , Mel Gorman , David Rientjes , Zhang Yanmin Subject: Re: [this_cpu_xx V6 7/7] this_cpu: slub aggressive use of this_cpu operations in the hotpaths In-Reply-To: <84144f020910120614r529d8e4em9babe83a90e9371f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <20091007211024.442168959@gentwo.org> <20091007211053.378634196@gentwo.org> <4AD307A5.105@kernel.org> <84144f020910120614r529d8e4em9babe83a90e9371f@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 758 Lines: 17 On Mon, 12 Oct 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote: > The patch looks sane to me but the changelog contains no relevant > numbers on performance. I am fine with the patch going in -percpu but > the patch probably needs some more beating performance-wise before it > can go into .33. I'm CC'ing some more people who are known to do SLAB > performance testing just in case they're interested in looking at the > patch. In any case, I am warming up my synthetic in kernel tests right now. Hope I have something by tomorrow. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/