DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        b=a8b40tgokzvtNulplTua1YUQNsTcQRKWkJy/J1hFYPW7GN1oWEDNjPmI5cvDVLxhrj
         LW6v2xn8mJTv+iMIl1pTLVygg/ln4vYlvRwGzdVIhR2P/+/kCMTWQusiqDSu2aw/QHtz
         BA28BM+cvq/1ToEbUe43mNysfqLF51vjdiZ4I=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20091012.234214.110950674.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <b9df5fa10910111944s274207aica39c0e646c10f7a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20091011.223502.77690228.davem@davemloft.net>
	 <b9df5fa10910122227r710d6782m89fc9ec4273487b8@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20091012.234214.110950674.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:00:18 +0600
Message-ID: <b9df5fa10910130000k20f53a4pfc3593db95c66138@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] connector: Passing required parameter for function 
	cn_add_callback.
From: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, zbr@ioremap.net,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1461
Lines: 40

On 10/13/09, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com>
>
> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:27:49 +0600
>
>
>  > On 10/12/09, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>  >> From: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com>
>  >>  Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:44:33 +0600
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>  >   */
>  >>  > -static void cn_proc_mcast_ctl(struct cn_msg *msg)
>  >>  > +static void cn_proc_mcast_ctl(struct cn_msg *msg, struct
>  >>  > netlink_skb_parms *nsp)
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> Your patches are unusable because your email client corrupts the
>  >>  patch, here you can see it is splitting up long lines.
>  >>
>  >>  Please fix this up and resubmit.
>  > Oops..... sorry for that. This is the second time I'm facing this
>  > problem. I'll try to fix it.
>  > I'm resubmitting the patch. Here I've recreate the patch to split the
>  > line into two.
>  > And it just reaches its 80 line mark. Hopefully it will be okay.
>
>
> Upstream and my net-next-2.6 tree both have this function with
>  the proper parameters, maybe Andrew's -mm tree had some conflicts
>  and they weren't dealt with correctly.
>
Ah, sorry again. I should've check the upstream first. Sorry for noise.

Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/