Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759473AbZJMLOX (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:14:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752175AbZJMLOW (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:14:22 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f186.google.com ([209.85.221.186]:54958 "EHLO mail-qy0-f186.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751277AbZJMLOV (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:14:21 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Ck9+j6v1bw6wm0VjllbXzPnfR7Dmt+6/PdMmF0zmvMHgcrdNpHWe/46ypuEj5CBipo Y72YB7tgVFSwx9y3vYpIBUt70jtHvjPVh01jPbz90yi7rYqLvRWcFirpOs5ASSTxKLlH AaarooJtsNuLcdSnodRpgb+MThLnBq86kl2f0= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <359ed6810910130335m45919d6ala921d4cbfa5a341a@mail.gmail.com> References: <20091007061701.GA7567@july> <359ed6810910130335m45919d6ala921d4cbfa5a341a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:43:43 +0530 Message-ID: <5d5443650910130413t6ecd3d54p214d8f80972ed128@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Haptic: add haptic class From: Trilok Soni To: Jani Nikula Cc: Kyungmin Park , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Torokhov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1392 Lines: 33 Hi Kyungmin, Dmitry, On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 09:17, Kyungmin Park wrote: >> New haptic class support. >> This class handles the haptic devices. > > I'm wondering why a haptic class is needed when there is force > feedback support. Admittedly, I don't know the force feedback > implementation too well, but could someone please enlighten me on > this? Am I missing something here? > > I see haptics as simple force feedback, just with (usually) small > force and short duration. There are devices out there doing haptics > using vibra motors, which I think would be limited if implemented > using this haptics class driver. Would it be somehow problematic > interfacing with the simple haptic hardware using the force feedback > API? Please share your inputs on ff_device usage instead of haptics class. I think Dmitry could add some points here as I don't see much users of ff_device and I don't see any embedded device (like mobile) using it. -- ---Trilok Soni http://triloksoni.wordpress.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/triloksoni -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/